10' In order to substantiate their contention, the rst Respondent encrosed relevant material documents along with the Repry filed by them. As per the said material documents, it is clear that the lst Respondent issued demand notice dt.19.11.2018 u/s 13(2) of the SARFAESI Act, 2002 and sent the said notice to the Respondent No.2 and guarantors/mortgagors through Regd. Post as evidenced by the copies of postal acknowledgements fired by ths 1"t Respondent. Thereafter, the 1st Respondent issued possession notice dt.o1.0A.2Ot9 u/s t3(a) of the Act, 2OO2 to the Respondent No.2 and others. The said possession notice was published in Telugu and English daily newspapers as evidenced by the copies of paper publication filed by the lst Respondent and the said notice was also affixed on the schedule property as depicted in the copy of photograph liled by the l"t Respondent. Thus the 1"t Respondent has duly followed Rute 8(1)&(2) of security Interest (Enforcement) Rures, 2oo2 in issuing possession notice to the borrower/guarantors/mortgagors. Thereafter, the lst Respondent being secured creditor, proceeded u/s 14 ofthe sARFAESI Act, 2oo2 a,.d, taken physical possession of the secured asset by duly foilowing the to the orders of Ld.CMM, Cyberabad through advocate ,the l"t Respondent obtained valuation report approved valuer and issued e Auction Sale Notice auction of the schedule property on said auction was not materialized in view of the So, the relief claimed by the Appticant in 5
