In an application before the Debts Recovery Tribunal-I, Chandigarh, the applicant failed to appear. The Presiding Officer dismissed the application in default as the applicant was not pursuing the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
SA/226/2025 HARBANS KAUR CHADHA Vs PUNJAB AND SIND BANK
19.03.2026
Item No.48
Present: None for the Applicant. Mr. I.P. Singh, Counsel for respondent bank.
This is third pass over since morning. Nobody is appearing on behalf of the applicant. It is already 01:00 p.m. It appears that applicant is not interested in pursuing this matter. Therefore, application filed by the applicant is dismissed in default .
File be consigned to record room after due compliance.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
PANKAJ
Harbans Kaur Chadha
Punjab and Sind Bank
A S Narang
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
