Mr Tithi Singha v. Canara Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
Appearing on behalf of the applicant in a recovery proceeding, the lawyers filed an application stating that the respondent bank issued new demand and possession notices, and the applicant is no longer willing to proceed with the specific proceedings.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERYTRIBUNAL-3'KOLKATA Order Sheet(Continuation)
| CaseNo,SA/2 | ffianaraBank&Anr' 2!/2025 |
|
|---|---|---|
| Orderwithsignature | Office action withdateand datedsign.ture ofparties when |
|
| orderNo.05 Dt.12.05.2026 Sl.No.15 |
Present: -For SAaPplicant :LdcounselMsSusmita -ForresPondent bank :None PaulwithSuPritYMondal |
|
| LdcounselfortheApplicanthasmovedI A 127712026alongwithput uppetitionbeing r.A.tzL6l2026. LdcounselforSAapplicantsubmitsthatthe respondent bankhas publisheda freshdemandnotice dated01.02.2026andpossessionnoticedated 17.04.2026andtheSAapplicant desiresnotto proceedwith theaforesaidproceedingany longer' AstheSAapplicantisnot willingtoproceed with theaforesaidproceeding andtheSAwasfiledagalnst possessionnotice dated 20.01.2026and its publication dated21.01.2026,SAbeingsAl227/2025alongwith ,1[:J8i:"" DRT-2,Kolkata AdditionalchargeofDRT-3, Kolkata |
Parties & counsel
- respondent
State Bank of India
- other
Debts Recovery Tribunal-2, Kolkata
- other
Debts Recovery Tribunal-3, Kolkata
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court