Mamun Hossain v. Canara Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
A Debt Recovery Tribunal dismissed a case against the applicant due to non-prosecution as no counsel appeared for the applicant despite notice calls, leading to a conclusion that the applicant lost interest in the matter.
What did the court decide?
The case is dismissed due to non-prosecution.
What the court decided
ORDER SHEET
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, SILIGURI SA/04/2026
Applicant
| Mamun Hossain Vs Canara Bank |
Applicant Defendants |
|
|---|---|---|
| Date of Order |
Order with Signature | Office action with date and dated signature of parties when necessary. |
| Item No.21 | Order No. |
27.08.2026
Present:
Counsel for the applicant : None.
Counsel for the respondent : Mr. Rajneesh Tripathi.
On previous date of hearing also no one had participated in the hearing for the applicant and thus list this matter for second call.
RAKESH Digitally signed by RAKESH PATI PATI TIWARI Date: 2026.08.28 TIWARI 18:30:33 +05'30'
(RAKESH PATI TIWARI) Presiding Officer DRT-Siliguri
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Mamun Hossain
- respondent
Canara Bank
Coram
Rakesh Pati Tiwari
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court