M/S Mahavir Food Products v. Uco Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
The DRT-I, Chandigarh dismissed an SA/16/2026 application in default as the applicant failed to appear by 2:00 p.m. after the third pass hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
SA/16/2026 M/S MAHAVIR FOOD PRODUCTS Vs UCO BANK
14.08.2026 Item No.32
Present: None for the Applicant. Mr.RK Jindal, Counsel for respondent bank.
This is third pass over since morning. Nobody is appearing on behalf of the applicant. It is already 02:00 p.m. It appears that applicant is not interested in pursuing this matter. Therefore, application filed by the applicant is dismissed in default .
File be consigned to record room after due compliance.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
MANOJ
M/s Mahavir Food Products
UCO Bank
A S Narang
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court