The Debts Recovery Tribunal dismissed a Securitization Application in default due to the non-appearance of the applicant despite multiple passes.
The Securitization Application is dismissed in default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 20
Case No. SA/133/2023
MANOJ KUMAR Vs SHUBHAM HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FINANCE COMPANY
Date: 10.07.2026.
Proceedings through hybrid mode
Present:
None for the Applicant
Shri Pramod Kumar, Counsel for the Respondent Bank/FI
In this matter, nobody appeared on behalf of the applicant from the last so many dates and today also, despite pass over the matter none appeared on behalf of the applicant. Therefore, this Securitization Application stands dismissed in default on account of non-prosecution.
File be consigned to record, as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Manoj Kumar
Shubham Housing Development Finance Company
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
