Simranjit Singh v. Canara Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
The applicant stated the account was settled under the OTS scheme and does not want to pursue the salvage action. The DRT therefore disposed of the application.
What did the court decide?
The application was disposed of as the applicant stated the account was settled under OTS.
What the court decided
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
SA/118/2025 SIMRANJIT SINGH Vs CANARA BANK
20.02.2026 Item No.9
Present: Ms.Ridhi Bansal, Counsel for the Applicant (on vc). Mr.SC Prajapati proxy for Mr.Nitin Grover, Counsel for respondent bank.
Counsel for the applicant states that the account has been settled under OTS scheme and she does not want to pursue the present SA. Accordingly, the SA stands disposed of . File be consigned to the record room after due compliance.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
MANOJ
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Simranjit Singh
- respondent
Canara Bank
Coram
A S Narang
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court