In this default appearance matter before the Chandigarh Debt Recovery Tribunal, the Appellant failed to appear. The Presiding Officer noted the absence and dismissed the application due to lack of applicant interest.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
SA/105/2026 HARPREET KAUR Vs INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK
07.07.2026 Item No.26
Present: None for the Applicant. Mr.Sukhvinder Singh Chaudhary, Counsel for respondent bank.
Mr.Sukhvinder Singh states that he has filed the reply. This is third pass over since morning. Nobody is appearing on behalf of the applicant. It is already 03:00 p.m. It appears that applicant is not interested in pursuing this matter. Therefore, application filed by the applicant is dismissed in default .
File be consigned to record room after due compliance.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
MANOJ
Harpreet Kaur
Indian Overseas Bank
A S Narang
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
