Dismissed
Padma Sanjay Shinde v. Indian Bank
DRTSA/102/2025
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Dismissed
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
| 30.01.2026 | Exh. | Roznama-MDRT-II S.A. No.102 of 2025 |
Next date |
|---|---|---|---|
| None for the Applicant. |
|||
| Ms Taniya Singh, Advocate for the Defendant. |
|||
| rst – 26 | From the perusal of the record, it shows that no representation was made by the Applicant on three previous dates. Even today, no representation is made by the Applicant either personally or through the Advocate or through VC. It appears that the Applicant is not interested in pursuing this case any further. So, S.A. No.102 of 2025 stands dismissed and disposed of accordingly. Pending IAs, if any, stands disposed of. File be consigned to the Record Room after due compliance. Sd/- P.O. DRT-II |
Closed |
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Applicant
- respondent
State/Respondent
Coram
AI extract
None provided
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court