The Securitization Application was disposed of as infructuous since the Respondent Bank submitted that the account involved in the application had been closed.
The Securitization Application is disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 40
Case No. SA/283/2026
BRIJVALLABH SINGH Vs AU SMALL FINANCE BANK LIMITED
Date: 04.06.2026.
Proceedings through hybrid mode
Present:
Shri Dishant Maheshwari, Counsel for the Applicant
Shri Ayush Kumar Jain, Counsel for the Respondent Bank/FI
Ld. Counsel for the respondent bank submitted that account stands closed and he prayed that the SA may be disposed of as infructuous.
Considering the submissions made by Ld. Counsel for the respondent bank, this Securitization Application stands disposed of as infructuous.
File be consigned to record, as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
BRIJVALLABH SINGH
AU SMALL FINANCE BANK LIMITED
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
