Bank of India v. Naja
DRTOA/936/2025
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
coNTD.ORDER -sHEET
¶2
PAGENO
¶3
-cASENO
¶4
| DATE | DESCRIPTIONOFTI{EORDER | REMARK |
|---|---|---|
| on.c36/25 ,L!01.76 |
Appticantby ShriShreyasDubey' Advocate Nonefor theDefendants ConsideringtheaffidavitoftheOfficer of'thd appticant bankandthesubmission;dbttheCounsetfor Appticant [i,tr-li{$#i'tr#jil'."{#$"iii'"'hH the recordroom' r icationfor Counset fortheAPPIicantfitedan ofShrl instant on28.01.26su with ChiefManager. Itis that lnithe PrinceeJee, thavesettled theaccountbY an OAtheaPPtican 11,40,0(p/- has at amountofRs' foraPPticantPraYsfor ofthePresent oA. |
|
| * {PravasKumar\ingh) Presidingofficer, DRT:LUCKNOW , lrrcharge:DRTJabalPur |
a |
¶5
1 I 11 .dili.- --:$t:,..&.ri;t,,.rilra,:.,r,. r' .-.'
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court