Disposed
Icici Bank Limited v. Sadiya
DRTOA/702/2023
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
OA withdrawn after bank officer's affidavit confirmed respondent deposited Rs. 21 Lakh under one-time settlement scheme. Order disposed of as withdrawn.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
GONTD. ORDE R. SHEET
¶2
PAGE NO
¶3
CASE NO
¶4
| DATE | DESCRIPTION OFTHEORDER | REMARK |
|---|---|---|
| o4702t23 28.01.26 |
AppticantbyShriVedant Agrawat, Advocate NonefortheDefendants |
|
| CounselfortheAppticantfitedanAppticationfor withdrawalsupportedwithaffidavitofShriSandeep Dwivedi,Senior Manager,on09.09.25.ltisstatedthatin theinstantOAtheDefendantshavesettledtheaccountby depositinganamountofRs.21Lakh underonetime setttementscheme.TheCounselforappticantpraysfor withdrawal of thepresentOA. |
||
| ConsideringtheaffidavitoftheOfficeroftheappticant bankandthesubmissionmade bytheCounselforAppticant thattheDefendanthasdeposited an amountofRs.21Lakh towardsfutlandfinalsetttementofthecase,thepresent OAstands disposedofaswithdrawn.Record be consignedto therecordroom.Record be consignedto therecordroom. |
||
| $t , (PravasKuma\ingh; Presidingofficer, DRT:LUCKNOW lncharge:DRTJabatpur |
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- respondent
GONTD
- applicant
Applicant
Coram
AI extract
Pravas Kumar Singh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court