State Bank of India v. Sumit Pavankumar Jain
Case brief
What is this about?
This order corrects a clerical mistake in a previously issued judgment by amending the branch name of the address for the Stressed Assets Recovery Branch mentioned in the Recovery Certificate. The court directed the issuance of a corrected Recovery Certificate as per the amended details.
What did the court decide?
Corrections to the judgment regarding the recovery certificate branch address and direction to issue a new Recovery Certificate accordingly.
What the court decided
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, AURANGABAD (BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT AT AURANGABAD)
ORDER SHEET
Date: 04 th July, 2026. OA No. 912/2024
ORIGINAL APPLICATION No. 912/2024
CORRECTED ORDER
State Bank of India
Applicant/s
Versus
Sumit Pavankumar Jain. Defendant(s) / Respondent(s)
1. In this matter at the time of preparation of Recovery
Certificate it is noticed that there is a mistake occurred in the
Applicant Bank branch name as Branch Dhule & having
Stressed Assets Recovery wrongly inserted. It should be
read .
RACPC, Chh. Sambhajinagar & having its Stressed Assets
Recovery Branch (SARB) at Plot No. 79, N-5, CIDCO
Aurangabad – 431003.
2. Save and except the above, there are no other changes in the
Judgment and Order dated 18 th November, 2025.
3. A copy of this order be placed along with the Judgment and
Order dated 18 th November, 2025, Recovery Certificate be
issued accordingly.
Sd/-
(Dr. J.R. Chauhan)
Presiding Officer,
Debts Recovery Tribunal, Aurangabad.
Classifi cation No. of Exh.
(AMBADAS) Page No. 1of 1
Parties & counsel
- applicant
State Bank of India
- respondent
Sumit Pavankumar Jain
Coram
Dr. J.R. Chauhan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 · J. R. Chauhan
- Order 2 — this page · J. R. Chauhan
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court