Uco Bank v. Pardhi Brothers
DRTOA/878/2025
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
PAGE NO.
¶2
CONTD. ORDER. SHEET
¶3
| DATE | DESCRIFTIONOFTHE ORDER | REItIARK |
|---|---|---|
| oA'878t25 L9,01.26 |
Apptlcantby Shri AdamyaBaajpai'Advocate, l Nonefor theDefendantt , I irilTi-ii:,'lir.fl-{,ff:,'liil'r:1,fi$:,:r[i SheetatLanke,li\anager'-I $ff::llir,i';llflfl:f,:il'$ffi#:# ofthePresentOA' ConsideringtheaffidavltoftheOffic€rof.the-aPPticant bank andthesubmission,i'a"uvthecounsetfor Appficant ffiiii; "ilqi:'gJ::,1;[Hlnino,'Tn3nl.;1h 21.25,@4t'Lakhtowaro nrisentOAstandsoitposua-oi-iiwithdrawn'Recordbe L-.-iigii"at"therecord room' I <br>(PravasKumar'Sirigh) Presidingofficer;I DRT:LUCKNOWI lnchargs:DRTJalgtPur |
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court