The DRT allowed the bank's application for recovery of a debt of approximately Rs. 30.92 lakh plus interest and costs against a defendant who appeared ex-parte, based on the strength of the Evidence Affidavit and marked documents.
Defendant directed to pay Rs.30,92,316.56 with future interest and costs; Recovery Certificate issued.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-II AT HYDERABAD
DATED THIS THE O6TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2026
PRESENT: SH. RAMESHWAR KOTHE, B.Com., L.LB. (Hons.), M.A. PRESIDING OFFICER
Original Application No: 765 OF 2025
Bank of Baroda., Nandyal Branch, Nandyal, Kurnool District. Rep. by its Authorised Officer. .....Applicant
Versus
Mr. Lanke Praveen Kumar S/o. Sri. L. Sekhar, Aged 26 Years Male, Occ: Business, R/o. 3-64, Gonavaram Panyam, Nandyal, Kurnool Dist, A.P.
.... DeFendant
Counsel for the Applicant : Mr. Trivikram Ch ittu ru Defendants :Ex-parte
:: ORDER ::
OA.No.765/2025
Whether the Applicant Bank is entitled for the claim made in the OA against the Defendant?
iii) the applicant bank is enutled for the costs.
a The Applicant Bank is directed to file Cost Memo within 2 weeks from the date of receipt ot this ofter.OX!
3
OA.No.75sl2025
.\r,
(RAMESHWAR KOTHE) PRESIDING OFFICER
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Applicant Bank is entitled to the claim made in the Original Application against the Defendant?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Bank of Baroda
Rameshwar Kothe
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
