1-2. The applicant's claim rests entirely on the validity of the gift deed and its revocation, which is a matter already pending adjudication before the competent civil court in O.S. No.19/2016. As on date, the competent court has not cancelled the revocation deed. Applicant's own admission is that the interim injunction granted in OS No.1912016 was not extended thereafter on the opposition of the counsel for respondents on the ground that SARFAESI Act bars jurisdiction of Civil Court. Prima facie, the applicant failed to establish that as on the date of creation of mortgage she was still holding the title over the subject property. In fact, as per her own version applicant parted wlth the title of the property long before creation of mortgage by subsequent purchaser. Merely because the applicant has questioned the revocation deed, it does not automatically invalidate subsequent transactions or the mortgage created in favour of the respondent Bank. It is also the own admission of applicant is that the interim injunction granted in OS No.19/2016 was not extended /Xv..,a L//'cs'
