02.02.2025
Sr. No.25 OA No.547/2025
ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO. 547/2025
Bank of Maharashtra ..Applicant
Versus
Universal Extrusions and Ors. ..Defendants
Mr. Vaibhav R. Patil - Advocate for the applicant bank.
None present for the defendants.
1. The learned counsel for the applicant submits that defendant Nos.
11
1 to 4 and 6 have been served through RPAD on 21/10/2025 and
24/10/2025. The defendant No.5 is deceased, and her husband,
who is already in the array as defendant No.2 has been duly
served through RPAD on 21/10/2025. Service affidavit is filed
on record at Exhibit-11. Despite service, the defendants neither
appeared nor filed WS. Statutory period for filing WS has
already been over. Hence, Counsel for applicant requested to
pass ex-parte order against defendants.
2. Heard.
3. None appeared for the defendants, though served. In these
circumstances, it appears that, the defendant Nos.1 to 4 and 6 are
not interested in filing the Written Statement or has nothing to
show cause; hence, they are hereby proceeded ex-parte .
4. Counsel for applicant is hereby directed to implead LR’ s of
deceased defendant No.5 before next date of hearing.
List this matter for impleading LR’s of deceased defendant No.5 on
21 st April, 2026.
(Dr. J.R. Chauhan)
Presiding Officer
Debts Recovery Tribunal, Aurangabad
Classific ation No. of Exh.