The Debts Recovery Tribunal proceeded ex parte against the defendants in Original Application No. 239/2024 after service via publication and their absence at the hearing.
Proceeded ex parte against defendant Nos. 1 and 2.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, AURANGABAD (BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT AT AURANGABAD) ORDER SHEET
| 02.02. Sr. No |
2026 .27 OA No.239/2024 |
|
|---|---|---|
| Classific ation |
No. of Exh. |
|
| 12 | ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO. 239/2024 Maharashtra Gramin Bank ..Applicant Versus Jalindar S/o Damodhar Bhingardeo and another ..Defendants Mr. Kalyankar J.R. - Advocate for the applicant bank. None present for the defendants. 1. The learned counsel for the applicant submits that defendant Nos. 1 and 2 have been served through paper publication on 24/09/2025. Service affidavit is filed on record at Exhibit-12. Despite service, the defendants neither appeared nor filed WS. Statutory period for filing WS has already been over. Hence, Counsel for applicant requested to pass ex-parte order against defendant Nos.1 and 2. 2. Heard. 3. None appeared for the defendant Nos.1 and 2, though served. In these circumstances, it appears that, the defendants are not interested in filing the Written Statement or has nothing to show cause; hence, they are hereby proceeded ex-parte**. 4. Counsel for applicant is hereby directed to complete affidavit of evidence marking exhibits to original documents before next date of hearing. List this matter for arguments on21stApril, 2026. (Dr. J.R. Chauhan)** Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Aurangabad |
[Ambadas] (OA No.239/2024) Page 1 of 1
Maharashtra Gramin Bank
Jalindar S/o Damodhar Bhingardeo
Dr. J.R. Chauhan
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
