Disposed

State Bank of India v. Sonali Tapan Debnath

DRT25 Jul 2026OA/365/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a Special National Lok Adalat organized by the Debts Recovery Tribunal, Aurangabad, the applicant bank withdrew the recovery proceedings after the defendant paid dues under an Out of Court Settlement (OTS). The court disposed of the original application and allowed the refund of court fees.

What did the court decide?

Withdrawal of OA No. 36512025 allowed; Court Fees refunded to applicant bank as per rules; Original documents returned.

State Bank of India versus Sonali Tapan Debnath — Banking and Recovery | DRT (2026)

¶1

BEFORE THE SPECIAL AND NATIONAL LOK^ADALAT ORGANISED ON 25^th July . 2026 BY^THE DEBTS RECO VERY TRIBUNAL. AURANGABAD^AND DSTRCIT LEGAL SERVICES AUTHORIY

¶2

OA No. 36512025^(Sr.no. l8)

¶3

OA WITHDRAWAL

¶4

Apptican(q): State Bank Of India (hereinafter referred to as / borrower / guarantors )

¶5

VERSUS

¶6

Defendant(s) : Sonali Ta^{pan Debnath} (hereinafter referred to as bank / financial^institution)

¶7

Dctails of dispute / claim:^{'the claim of the bank is to the tune of} Rs. 30,37324l-^{with costand interest.}

¶8

The defendant/s has^{paid the dues in his / their loan account an amountof} Rs. 30,37,324 /-^{(RupeesThirty lakh ThirtySeventhousand Three hundred} and Twenty Four rupees^only )^{as settlement amount under OTS. Therefore, the} applicant bank does not^{want to proceedfurther. Hence present Original} Application may be^{withdrawnas per the Consent Terms/Pursis/IA filed by the} bank which is marked^{as 'A'.}

¶9

. Since the matter^{is before the Special and National Lok-Adalat, the Court} Fees be refunded to^{the applicant bankas per rules.}

¶10

In view of the above Consent Terms/pursis/IA filed on record / uploaded

¶11

online.

¶12

o Applicant(s)
e
a
B, i-

¶13

Respondent( s )

¶14

icant(s) ht^+u rized Representative 4Jil.

¶15

Advocate for the Respondent(s) /Authorised Representative

¶16

Adv. ji Panchal Me mber

¶17

Special and Nntional Lok Adalat

¶18

Shri. Maka n Adwa nt Chatrman Special and National Lok Adalat

Date : 25.07.2026

Place: Aurangabad.

()RDER

In vieu' of the above consent terms/pursis/lA which are filed online/offline in the present matter, the order is passed. The OA No. 36512025 stands disposed of accordingly.

¶23

Refu,d of court Fees is ailorved i,.s per rules. l'he arvard stands satisfied a Original documents be retumed as per mles. /A/

¶24

Date: 25.07':026

¶25

Shri. Makalar(d Adrvanr Chairman Special and National Lok Adalat

Page No. 2

Ev-,,- fi

BEFORE THE SPECIALANDNATIONALLOK ADALAT OP.GANISE} ON 3O.h MAY 2025 BY TTTE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL. AURANGABAD

oo n".P.i.fu*

WITHDRAWAL PURSIS

Applicant(s):^gBL

VER.SIJS

Defendant(s): sq,-li Ld,ab 4^Av11=- ( hereinafter referred to as / borrower / guarantor(s) )

¶35

Details of disnute / claim: The claim of the^{bank is to the tune of} Rs. .. .. . ..., . .. ..... with cost and interest.

¶36

The defendant/s has^paid the^{dues in his / their loan account an amount of} Rs. ..............(Rs ..,....Only ) as settlement^{amount under OTS'} Therefore, the applicant bank^{does not want to proceedfurther. Hence present} Original Application^{may be withdrawnas per the presentwithdrawalPursis} filed by the bank

¶37

The request for retum of^{originaldocumentsas per rules may be permitted.} Since the matter is before^{the Special and NationalLok-Adalat,the CourtFees} may please be refunded^{to the applicant bank as per rules'}

¶38

Applicant(s) Defendant(s) J&'. --\ O.r \ Advocate for the AFp I S ) Advocate for the Defendant(s) /Authorised Representati "{--t lrlJ /Authorised RePresentative 2ilt'ilrL4 Date : 30=b5J026 H"W@. Place : Aurangabad

State Bank of India v. Sonali Tapan Debnath

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

State Bank of India v. Sonali Tapan Debnath

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Axis Bank versus Raju alias Mr. Rajendra Ramdas Patare

Maharastra Gramin Bank versus M/s Dnyanai Agro Processing Centre

Union Bank of India versus Mr. Datta Shankarrao Kadlag

Union Bank of India versus M/S Sai Petroleum

Sitaram Prabhat Sapkal versus Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction Company Limited

Bank of India versus Asaram Shankar Kalal