The DRT dismissed the original recovery application as withdrawn after the applicant bank filed an application stating that the loan account was amicably settled and the settlement amount was deposited by the defendants.
The original Order Application was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HDFC Bank ttd v/s Kothari ptastics & 2 ors. oA294/22 10t07 /26 Appticant-Bank by Shri Abhishek Agrawat, Advocate None for the Defendants
The Ld Counsel . for the Appticant has fited an apptication for withdrawat or'oiiginal apptication rn 4.503/26 supported with affidavit of Shri Shubham Kesharwani, post Legat Manager. rt is stated that the Appticant-Bank has fited thetresent oA fo,. ,ecove.y of Rs 29,41,239..56 together wiin interest and other retiefs against the Deiendants. rt is rurtner-staieo that during the pendency of the matter, the toan account has been - amicabty settted U"i*"",'ii.r" parties for a sum.of Rs 16,25,123.00 as futl and finat setttement. The Ld counsel ior the Appticani ruriner prays for withdrawat of the present OA.
Considqring the apptication for withdrawat and the submission made by the Counsel for Appl.icunt+urL that the Defendants have deposited the entire setttement amount of Rs. 16,25,123.00 to*urOi irtt and final setttement of the ctaim, the prese.t Oa stands dismissed as withdrawn. Record u" .ontign"o to the record room.
_ds \o'? (Pankaj Ku mar ) Presiding officer DRT-2 Ahmedabad lncharge : DRT Jabatpur
HDFC Bank Ltd
Kothari Plastics & 2 ors.
Pankaj Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
