Dismissed
Icici Bank Limited v. Kailash Patidar
DRTOA/235/2026
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Withdrawal Affidavit accepted; the present OA stands dismissed as withdrawn upon full and final settlement of the claim.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
CONTD. RDER. SHEET
¶2
| DATE | DESCRIPTION OF THE ORDER | REMARK |
|---|---|---|
| rcIUBankLtd.vsKailashpatidar | ||
| oA23 r0t07 1 |
2026 \e a (PankajKumar vav) Presidingofficer DRT-2Ahmedabad' Incharge:DRTJabalpur Applicant byShriAdamya Bajpai, Advocate NonefortheDefendant TheLdCounselfortheApplicanthasfileda WithdrawalAffidavitNo.-6995126ofShri SandeepDwivedi, CheifManager.Itis deposedthatduringthependencyofthe presentOA, theloanaccounthasbeen amicably settledforanamountofRs. 10,00,0001- andtheloanaccountisclosed. ,TheLdCounselfortheApplicantfurther praysfor withdrawalofthepresentOA. Considering thewithdrawalaffidavitandthe submissionmadebytheCounselfor Applicant-BankthattheDefendanthas depositedtheentiresettlementamountof Rs.10,00,000i-towardsfullandfinal settlementoftheclaim,thepresentOA stands dismissed aswithdrawn.Recordbe consignedtothe record room. >b |
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
RCIUBankLtd.
- respondent
Kailashpatidar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court