In a Lok Adalat proceeding, the petitioner bank and the respondent defendant, who represented a Chandra Darka Upadhyay, settled a debt recovery dispute. The claim was reduced to Rs. 12,70,000 under compromise, leading to the disposal of the Original Application.
The Original Application is disposed of in terms of the settlement amount of Rs. 12,70,000.00.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT AT DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-1, KOLKATA. JEEVANSUDHA BUILDING, 42C,JAWAHARLAL NEHRU ROAD KOLKATA-700 071
Dated 2 5 th April , 2026
Plaintiff:
YES BANK LTD.
Represented by
Defendant/Respondent
Mr. Sourav Das, Ld. Advocate and Mr. Koushik Kumar Das, Authorised Officer CHANDRAKALA UPADHYAY Represented by-None
Case No. OA/279/2025 Present:
A W A R D
The dispute between the parties have been referred for determination in the Lok Adalat and the parties having compromised /settled the case/matter, the following award is passed in terms of the settlement:-
The case is taken up for hearing.
The claim of the petitioner Bank recoverable from the Defendant amounts to Rs. 32,43,587.72/-.
The parties have amicably settled dispute at Rs. 12,70,000.00/-.
In view of the compromise arrived between the parties the OA is disposed of in terms of the settlement.
Ld. Registrar is directed to refund of Court Fee to the Applicant Bank in terms of the Rules.
(SOMA CHOWDHURY BANDHU) (AMBUJA MOHAN DAS) LD. ADVOCATE JUDICIAL OFFICER (RETD.) MEMBER OF THE BENCH MEMBER OF THE BENCH OF LOK ADALAT OF LOK ADALAT
(19)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Original Application should be disposed of in terms of the settlement reached by the parties in the Lok Adalat.
YES BANK LTD.
CHANDRAKALA UPADHYAY
SOMA CHOWDHURY BANDHU
AMBHUJA MOHAN DAS
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
