Punjab and Sind Bank v. Santosh Rani and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Affairs heard where the applicant sought further time to file a withdrawal affidavit in an ongoing origin application.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-III, CHANDIGARH
ITEM NO. 68
OA/273/2023 IN IA Diary no/1338/2024 (APPLICATION FOR EX-PARTE ORDER) PUNJAB AND SIND BANK Vs SANTOSH RANI AND OTHERS
24.02.2026
Present: Sh. Lovish Kukkar, Advocate proxy for Sh. Neeraj Madan, Advocate for Applicant None for Defendants
Sh. Lovish Kukkar, Advocate seeks further time to file withdrawal affidavit.
Affidavit of withdrawal be filed before next date fixed. Put up on 02.03.2026 for withdrawal of ОА .
(MRIDULESH KUMAR SINGH) Presiding Officer DRT-III, Chandigarh
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Punjab and Sind Bank
- respondent
Santosh Rani
Coram
Mridulesh Kumar Singh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court