Icici Bank Limited v. Mukesh Kumar
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
oA 154t24 10/07 t26
lClCl Bonk Ltd. vs Mukesh Kumar Potidor & 4 Others
Appticant-Bank by Shri Vedant Agrawat, Advocate None for the Defendants
The Ld Counsel for the Appticant has fited an apptication for withdrawaI of originaI appticationlA 6179176 supported with affidavit of Shri VineetBhasin Manager. lt is stated that the Appticant-Bankhas fited the present OA for recovery of dues and other reliefs against the Defendants. lt is further stated that during the pendency of the matter, theloan account has been amicabty settted andthe Defendants have deposited the entire setttement amount of Rs. 15.56 Lakh. The LdCounsel forthe Appticant furtherprays for withdrawal of thepresent oA.
Considering the apptication for withdrawaland the submission made by the CounseI forAppl,icant'Bank that the Defendants have deposited theentire setttement amount of Rs. 15.56Lakh towardsfutI and finaI setttement of the ctaim, thepresentOA stands dismissed as withdrawn. So far as refund of CourtFee is concerned,Registrar is directed to consider the same asper [aw.
Record be consigned to therecord room.
a-e $ \D "t (Pankaj Kumar Upadhyay) Presiding officer DRT-2 Ahmedabad lncharge : DRT Jabalpur
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Bonk Ltd.
- respondent
Mukesh Kumar Potidor & 4 Others
- applicant
Bank
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court