Yes Bank v. Jahid
Case brief
What is this about?
The Presiding Officer of the DRT, Jaipur disposed of an IA filed by Yes Bank for withdrawal of the original application following account settlement, directing refund of court fees.
What did the court decide?
Withdrawal of Original Application allowed; Court fee refund directed.
What the court decided
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item no. 87
Case No.OA/233/2026
YES BANK Vs JAHID
Date: 27.08.2026.
Proceedings through hybrid mode Present:
Shri Pramod Kumar, Counsel for the Applicant
None for the Defendants
In this matter, Ld. Counsel for the applicant bank has filed an IA no. 963/2026 for withdrawal. He submits that account stands settled and he prayed for withdrawal of this Original Application and refund of court fee.
In view of the above submission, this Original Application stands disposed of. Registry is directed to refund the court fees as per rules. Accordingly, IA no. 963/2026 stands disposed of.
File be consigned to record, as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Parties & counsel
- applicant
YES BANK
- respondent
JAHID
Coram
Vimal Gupta
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court