Disposed

Bank of Maharashtra v. Ms Ashapura Communication and General

DRT25 Jul 2026OA/211/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Special and National Lok Adalat disposed of an Original Application filed by Bank of Maharashtra against a borrower. The borrower paid the settlement amount under the one-time settlement scheme. The bank requested withdrawal of the application and refund of fees, which were allowed.

What did the court decide?

Withdrawal of Original Application allowed; refund of court fees granted; original documents returned.

Bank of Maharashtra versus Ms Ashapura Communication and General — Banking and Recovery | DRT (2026)

¶1

BEFORE THE SPECIALANDNATIONALLOK ADALAT ORGANISED oN z*o.lutv, zozo ny run DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, AURANGABAD AND DSTRCIT LEGAL SERVICES AUTHORIY

¶2

OA No. 21112026^(Sr.no. 8)

¶3

OAWITHDRAWAL

¶4

Applicant(s): Bank Of Maharashtra

¶5

(hereinafter referred to as / borrower / guarantors )

¶6

VERSUS

¶7

Defendant(s) : Ms Ashapura Communication And General (hereinafter referred to as bank / financial institution)

¶8

Details of dis ute / claim: The claim of the bank is to the tune of Rs. 45,99,891/- with cost and interest

¶9

The defendant/s has paid the dues in his / their loan account an amount of Rs. 45,99,891 i- (Rupees Forty Five lakh Ninety Nine thousand Eight hundred and Ninety One rupees only) as settlement amount under OTS. Therefore, the applicant bank does not want to proceed further. Hence^present Original Application may be withdrawn as per the Consent Terms/PursisflA filed by the bank which is marked as 'A'.

¶10

. Since the matter is before the Special and National Lok-Adalat, the Court Fees be refunded to the applicant bank as^per rules.

¶11

In view of the above Consent Termslpursis/IA online.

¶12

dF
).-
Applicant(s)
he t. \i

¶13

filed on record / uploaded

¶14

Respondent(s)

¶15

Alvo3ate for the Applicanrls) /Authorized Representative

¶16

Advocate for the Responden(s) /Authorised Representative

¶17

Adv. i Panchal Mernber Special antl National Lok Adalat

¶18

Shri. Ma Adwant Chairman Special and National Lok Atlalat

¶19

Date : 25.07 .2026 Place : Aurangabad.

¶20

oRI) ER

¶21

In view of the abo.,;e consent terms/pursis/lA which are 1iled online/offline in the present matter, the orde:- ts l-.tassed. l'he OA No. 2tl 12026 stands disposeci of accorciingly.

¶22

Refund of Court Fees is allowed as per rules. The a Original documents be retruned i;s per rules.

¶23

stands satisfied.

¶24

Date : 25.07 .2026

¶25

Shri. M Adrlant C arrnian Srrccial and N:rtional t,ok Adalat

¶26

¶27

Page No. 2

¶28

BEFORE THE SPECIAL AND NATIONAL LOK ADALAT ORGANISED ON 30th MAY,2026 BY THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, AURANGABAD

¶29

oA No..g.t[ 24,-<

¶30

WITHDRAWAL PI.]RSIS

¶31

Anplicant(s): €d DKd+ l^dlva.xa*hrzq

¶32

VERSUS

¶33

Defendant(s) : rrl U^{A6J"s/ arv'd Ca'6lnYil(ai1(q} ' ( hereinafter referred to as i borrower / guarantor(s) )

¶34

Details of dispute / claim: The claim of the bank is to the tune of R..4.[.J.-].F.:I with cost and interest.

¶35

The CefendanVs has paiC the Cues in his / their loan account an amount 6f Rt.45.9.t.g.1lrn.&rrrfi^ffi.onlv ) as settlement amount under orS. ' u)nttThatv,-q eltb hlaadr4 n in+r ore . Therefore. the applicant'bank does ndt want to proce6d further. Hence^present Original Application may be withdrawn as per the present withdrawal Pursis filed by the bank

¶36

The request for retum of original documents as per rules may be^permitted. Since the matter is before the Special and National Lok-Adalat, the Court^Fees may please be refunded to the licant bank as per rules.

¶37

Applicant(s) Def'endant(s) E sqf,dM ate for the Applicant(for the Applicant(the Applicant(Applicant(^S Advocate for the Defendant(s) /Authorised Representative /Authorised Representative

¶38

Advo ate for the Applicant(for the Applicant(the Applicant(Applicant(^S /Authorised Representative

¶39

Date : 30-05-2026 Place : Aurangabad.

Bank of Maharashtra v. Ms Ashapura Communication and General

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bank of Maharashtra v. Ms Ashapura Communication and General

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Case details

Similar cases

Axis Bank versus Raju alias Mr. Rajendra Ramdas Patare

Maharastra Gramin Bank versus M/s Dnyanai Agro Processing Centre

Union Bank of India versus Mr. Datta Shankarrao Kadlag

Union Bank of India versus M/S Sai Petroleum

Sitaram Prabhat Sapkal versus Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction Company Limited

Bank of India versus Asaram Shankar Kalal