Disposed

Union Bank of India v. Ms New Hotel Galaxy

DRT25 Jul 2026OA/20/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This is an order of the Special and National Lok Adalat regarding an OA withdrawal. The applicant bank requested withdrawal of the recovery application since the defendant defendant has regularized dues, making the account standard, and sought refund of court fees and return of documents.

What did the court decide?

OA No. 20/2025 disposed; Court Fees refunded; Original documents returned; Award satisfied.

Union Bank of India versus Ms New Hotel Galaxy — Service and Employment | DRT (2026)

¶1

BEFORE THE SPEC IAL AND NATIONAL LOK^ADALAT ORGANISED ON 25 Jrulv,2026 BY THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRTBU NAL, AURANGABAD^AND DSTRCIT LEGAL SERVICES AUTHORIY

¶2

OA No. 20/2025^(Sr.no. 284 )

¶3

OA WITHDRAWAL

¶4

Annlicant⁽ s): Union Bank Of India (hereinafter referred to as / borrower / guarantors )

¶5

VERSUS

¶6

Defendant(s) : Ms New Hotel Galax v (hereinafter referred to as bank / financial institution)

¶7

Details of dispute / claim: The claim of^{the bank is to the tune of} Rs. 26,93,561 /- with cost and^interest.

¶8

The defendant/s has paid the dues in his^{/ their loan account is now standard.} Therefore, the applicant bank does^{not want to proceed further. Hencepresent} original Application may be^{withdrawnas per the consent Terms/Pursis/IA} filed by the bank which is marked^as 'A'.

¶9

. Since the matter is before the Special^{and National Lok-Adalat,the Court} Fees be refunded to the applicant^{bank as per rules.}

¶10

In view of the above Consent Terms/PursisflA filed on record / uploaded online.

¶11

Applicant(

¶12

Respondent(s)

¶13

Advocate lor the Applicant(s) /Authorized Representative

¶14

Advocate for the Respondent(s) /Authorised Rep resentative

¶15

Adv. Panchal Member Special and National Lok Adalat

¶16

Shri. Ma d Adwant Chairrnan Special and Natinnal Lok Adalat

Date : 25.07.2426

Place: Aurangabad.

OF.DER

In vier.r' of the above consent terms/Pursis/lA which are filed onlineloffline in the present matter, the olcier is passed. The OA No. 2012025 stands disposed of accordingly.

¶21

Refund of Court Fees is allorved as^per rules. The award stands satisfied. ? Originai documents be retruned as pcr rules.

¶22

? (4//\ Shri. Makah*ndAdwant Cl,lairmarr Spccial and National LokAdalat

Date : 25.07.2026

Page No. 2

BEFORE TITE SPECIAL AND NATIONAL LOK^ADALAT ORGANIS ED ON 25th DAY OF JULY.^{2026 BY THE} DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL AURANGABAD

¶27

oAt20t2025

¶28

WITHDRAWAL PURSIS

¶29

Applicant(s): UNION BANKOF INDIA

¶30

VERSUS

¶31

Defendant(s) : NEW GALAXY HOTEL (hereinafter referred to as / borrower / guarantor(s))

¶32

Details of dis ute / claim: The claim of the bank is to the tune of Rs. 26,93,561 .741- with cost and interest.

¶33

The Defendants have regularized their loan account and the account^is now "Standard". Therefore, the Applicant Bank does not^want to^proceed further against the defendants. Hence,^present Original^{Application may be} withdrawn as per the present withdrawal Pursis filed by the bank^{with liberty} to file fresh OA in case the account again classifies^{as NPA.}

¶34

The request for return of original documents as^per rules may be permitted. Since the matter is before the Special and National Lok-Adalat, the Court Fees may please be refunded to the applicant bank^{as per rules.}

¶35

Appli s) Defendant(s)
€,4
* t61
Advocate the C.H. B Advocate for the Certificate
Authorised Representative Debtor / Certificate Debtor

¶36

Date: 2510712026 Place: Aurangabad

¶37

ISBJ]

Union Bank of India v. Ms New Hotel Galaxy

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Union Bank of India v. Ms New Hotel Galaxy

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Axis Bank versus Raju alias Mr. Rajendra Ramdas Patare

Maharastra Gramin Bank versus M/s Dnyanai Agro Processing Centre

Union Bank of India versus Mr. Datta Shankarrao Kadlag

Union Bank of India versus M/S Sai Petroleum

Sitaram Prabhat Sapkal versus Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction Company Limited

Bank of India versus Asaram Shankar Kalal