The Debts Recovery Tribunal allowed the applicant bank's application for recovery of dues. The court found the loan and due amount proved via documentation and directed recovery from mortgaged and personal properties.
Recovery of ₹31,47,403/- with interest; direction to sell mortgaged land and proceed with personal property of the defendant via Recovery Officer.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
BEFORE: A S NARANG, PRESIDING OFFICER
OA No: 1854/2022 Date of Institution: 02.09.2022 Date of Decision: 28.04.2026
Punjab Gramin Bank having its branches all over India and a branch at Akash Avenue Amritsar, Punjab.
……..Applicant Vs. Tajinder Singh s/o Sh. Surjan Singh, r/o VPO Bal Khurd, District Amritsar, Punjab.
……….Defendant
Advocates
Sh. Karan Dev Ray proxy counsel for Sh. Bhushan Bhatia, Counsel for the applicant bank. Defendant- ex parte vide order dated 24.02.2025 .
OA for the Recovery of ₹31,47,403/- with interest @10% per annum with yearly rests from 02.09.2022.
ORDER
2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the application for recovery of loan dues under Section 19 of the RDB Act is maintainable.
Whether the evidence placed on record sufficiently proves the advance of loan and the due amount.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Punjab Gramin Bank
Tajinder Singh
A S NARANG
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
