The applicant bank, via its counsel, stated that the parties had compromised the matter for Rs.7.40 lacs and voluntarily withdrew the Original Application. The Ostensible Appeal (OA) was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
OA/1136/2023 PUNJAB AND SIND BANK Vs GURPREET SINGH .
06.04.2026
Item No.74
Present: Mr. K.S. Rishi, Counsel for the Applicant. None for defendants.
Counsel for the applicant bank has filed the affidavit of Shri Manish Kumar, Chief Manager and has made a statement at the Bar that the parties have compromised the matter for a sum of Rs.7.40 lacs and he does not want to pursue the present OA. Accordingly, the OA filed by the applicant bank is dismissed as withdrawn .
File be consigned to record room after due compliance.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
HARSH
Punjab and Sind Bank
Gurpreet Singh
A S Narang
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
