The Debts Recovery Tribunal allowed the application to withdraw its original application and ordered the return of court fees.
Withdrawal of OA allowed; court fee to be returned.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 138
Case No. OA/109/2024
STATE BANK OF INDIA Vs MS TENACITY INDUSTRIES INC
Date: 27.04.2026.
Proceedings through hybrid mode:
Present:
Shri Alok Garg, Counsel for the applicant
Shri Harjeet Sharma, Counsel for the Respondent
Ld. Counsel for the applicant wants to withdraw this OA and also requested to return the court fee.
Request is allowed.
As the applicant wants to withdraw this OA, therefore OA stands disposed of as withdrawn. Court fees may be returned as per the rules. All pending IAs stands disposed of, if any.
File be consigned to record as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
cm
State Bank of India
Ms Tenacity Industries Inc
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
