The Tribunal disposed of O.A. No.829 of 2024 pursuant to agreed consent terms filed by the parties, withholding no specific issue for resolution.
The writ petition is disposed of accordingly based on consent terms.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| 16.01.2026 | Exh. | Roznama-MDRT-II O.A. No.829 of 2024 |
Next date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mr Bhavesh Poojary i/b M/s. MDP Partners, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr Vijay Jain, AGM of the Applicant Bank present in person. |
|||
| Mr Sachin Kaikini, Advocate for the Defendants. |
|||
| 9 | Ld. Advocate for the Applicant filed consent terms (exhibit-9). |
||
| nrb - 28 | 10 | Ld. Advocate for Defendants filed vakalatnama (exhibit-10). It is informed by the parties that consent terms has been arrived between the parties and consent terms (exhibit-9) is produced before this Tribunal. It is also informed consent terms has been arrived without any pressure or coercion may be taken on record. In view of consent terms, the present O.A. No.829 of 2024 is hereby disposed of accordingly. The consent terms shall remain part of this order. File be consigned to the Record Room after due compliance. Sd/- P.O. DRT-II |
Closed |
Applicant
Defendants
P.O.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
