The M.A. prayed to condone delay of 805 days in filing Writ Petition No. 1777 of 2025 is allowed by consent of all parties.
M.A. No.28 of 2026 allowed; S.A.(D) No.1777 of 2025 registered upon compliance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| 26.02.2026 | Exh. | Roznama-MDRT-II M.A. No.28 of 2026 |
Next date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mr Rajesh Nagori a/w Mr Raj Dani, Advocates for the Applicant. Mrs Uma S. Fadia, Advocate for Respondent No.1. Mr Aayush Kothari i/b Ms Sanjana Ghogare, Advocates for Respondent No.2. |
|||
| 6 7 |
Ld. Advocate for Respondent No.1 has filed vakalatnama (exhibit-6). Ld. Advocate for Respondent No.2 has filed vakalatnama (exhibit-7). Heard in M.A. No.28 of 2026. |
||
| 8 | During the hearing on M.A., Ld. Advocate for the Parties has filed joint pursis (exhibit-8). Ld. Advocate for Respondent Nos.1 and 2 submits that Respondent Nos.1 and 2 has no objection in allowing the M.A. as the subject matter has already been settled between the parties. Hence, Ld. Advocate for the parties prays to condone the delay of 805 days in filing S.A. (D) No.1777 of 2025 and to |
Page 1 of 2
| allow the M.A. No.28 of 2026. In the light of pursis and submissions made, M.A. No.28 of 2026 is allowed. The Registry is directed to register the S.A. (D) 1777 of 2025 after due compliance. |
||
|---|---|---|
| List the S.A. for hearing after compliance to its final number. |
||
| s.u - 123 | File be consigned to the Record Room after due compliance. Sd/- P.O. DRT-II |
Closed |
Page 2 of 2
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
