The application by Bank of India seeking instructions due to non-compliance with a Lok Adalat award was disposed of by allowing the applicant to proceed independently without Tribunal intervention.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 4
Case No. MA/129/2026 IN SA/453/2025
OM PRAKASH TAMBOLI Vs BANK OF INDIA
Date: 02.07.2026.
Proceedings through hybrid mode Present:
Shri R C Sharma, Counsel for the Applicant
This Misc. Application filed by the bank and counsel for the applicant submits that the SA applicants have not complied with the award passed in Lok Adalat, therefore, he seeks instruction from the Tribunal.
There is no need to seek any instruction from the Tribunal if the award is not complied with the borrowers, the bank will be at liberty to proceed.
In view of the above, this Misc. Application stands disposed of. File be consigned to record, as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Bank of India
OPP
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
