The Debts Recovery Tribunal observed that the applicant had failed to pay appropriate court fees and ordered the Registrar to restore the Securitization Application if fees were paid within three days before tagging the miscellaneous application to the original file.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 6
Case No. CA/2/2026
SHRI RAMESH CHANDRA SINDHI Vs MENTOR HOME LOANS INDIA LIMITED
Date: 09.06.2026.
Proceedings through hybrid mode Present:
Shri Abhishek Pareek, Counsel for the Applicant
Shri Nilesh Mathur, Counsel for the Respondent Bank/FI
In this matter, the counsel for the respondent bank submits that as on date the dues are approximately more than Rs. 67.00 Lac. On the other hand, the counsel for the applicant opposed the same and submits that this is a false statement as there is no liability of Rs. 67.00 Lac, but the statement is made by the counsel at bar.
If the applicant pays the appropriate court fees within three working days, then Registry will restore the Securitization Application on its original number.
In view of the above, this Misc. Application stands disposed of and tagged with Securitization Application. File be consigned to record, as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Ramesh Chandra Sindhi
Mentor Home Loans India Limited
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
