Appeal against an order of the Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jabalpur, challenging an auction-related decision involving multiple banks and property purchasers. The court noted that objections were addressed by the Recovery Officer and found the objections replied to.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
J
o DEBTS RECOVERYTRIBUNAL i
(for the States ofMadhya Pradeshand
(Presiding Officer- Hon'bte ShriPravas r/c DRT JABALPUR)
Singh
Aooeal 17/25
woLateshri Ashok Kumar Gupta, Aged about-tl4 Yean,
R./o 513, KurudKohka Ward no.07, Purani Bastl Kohka, Bhilai,
0z) smt.Shweta Gupta
WoShri Rakesh Aged about-41 Years, R/o House no.513, Hanuman Mandir, Purani BastlKurud, Bhilai,
Tehsil and DistrictDurg
Appllcant
Versus
Through iB AuthoriledOfficer,
Office at,4s floor,Pujarl ChambersC Building, Right Wing; TaSoreNagar, Dhamtari Road Near Pachpedi Naka,Ralpur' 492001.
S/o Shri OmPrakashJain,
R/o Ward no. 39,MahaveerNagar,Durg, Tehsil and District Durg(C.6.)
WoVinod KumarSengal,
R/o B-9, Royal Green Near ShankaracharyaEngineering Junwani, SAF Bhilai(C.G.) 49@20.
05) GauravSenBal,
S/o Vinod Kumar Sengal,
R/o B-9, Royal 6reen Near Shankaracharya Junwani, SAF Bhilai(C.G.) 49m20,
S/o Vinod Kumar Sengal,
)
R/o B-9,Royal6reenNearShankaracharya Engineering Collage' Junwani,SAF Bhitai (C'G')490020'
OB) Smt'Sushma Seengal,
OR.DER (Passed onTtiF-J;nUErY,20261
Appeal ds30(l) Recovery 1. By submittingthis of Debts andBankruPtcY Act, the Dsbt challengedthe order RecoveryTribunalJ abalPur
Appeal 2. Factsin briefare that this order is rlo.17125.ThisapPealhas proPoted to be 31 of the Act1993' bythe RecoveryDebts andBankruPtcY aggrievedbY Applicantbeing registeredAt DRC\o,21gt24. lt is shtedthat are guarantorof loan and neitherthe proce€ding no. 4to l0 i.e' affected respondent orderdated regi$eredAS DRCno.219t24,In Pursuant 77812019.k that the 18.04.23 PassedmO.A. no. 1 and applicantcameinto knowledge
J
Appeal 17125
tile objection beforethe Recovery Offrcer on I however, the same wasnot decided and the property has on auction and ithas been declared who has to deposit the balanceamountby 23.10.25.
0 5. Similar plea has beentaken bY have been Auction Purchaser. I findthat boththe replied by the RespondentBank and I have also ttre order passed by the Recovery Officer, Ifind Recovery
4
4 I 'il25 officerhas dealt with objectionsin and by the don't find N\ Q.Tt'',^ (Pravas Kumar\ingh) DRT: Incharge:
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the Recovery Officer properly considered the objections filed by the applicant regarding the auction of the property.
Whether the appeal filed by the applicant under Section 30(1) of the DRT Act, 1993 is maintainable in view of the course of proceedings.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Pawani Gupta
Ashok Kumar Gupta
Shweta Gupta
UCO Bank
YES Bank Ltd.
Roshan Jain
Pravas Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
