The court dismissed the application (T.O.A. No.134 of 2023) for want of prosecution as no representations were made by either party on relevant dates.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| 25.02.2025 | Exh. | Roznama-MDRT-II T.O.A. No.134 of 2023 |
Next date |
|---|---|---|---|
| None for the parties. | |||
| rst - 39 | Order-sheet of the learned Registrar shows that on 30.01.2025, no representation was made by either parties. Even today, no representation is made by either parties. It appears that the Applicant is not interested in pursuing this case any further. So, T.O.A. No.134 of 2023 stands dismissed for want of prosecution. File be consigned to the Record Room after due compliance. Sd/- P.O. DRT-II |
Closed |
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
