Rbl Bank Limited v. Kavita
Case brief
What is this about?
The Tribunal allowed an interlocutory application by the Applicant Bank seeking withdrawal of OA No.883 of 2024 following a settlement. The original order disposing the OA as withdrawn was passed.
What did the court decide?
Withdrawal of OA No.883 of 2024 allowed; OA disposed of as withdrawn.
What the court decided
| 24.02.2025 | Exh. | Roznama-MDRT-II O.A No.883 of 2024 |
Next date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mr Advait Hattangadi i/b M/s. M.V. Kini & Co., Advocates for the Applicant. None for Defendant. |
|||
| nrb - 41 | Applicant Bank has filed Withdrawal Application (I.A. No.1344 of 2024) for withdrawal of the O.A. No.883 of 2024. Pursuant to settlement arrived at with Defendants and having received Rs.18,53,250/- towards full and final settlement of the Claim under O.A., Applicant Bank moved an Interlocutory Application (I.A.) No.1344 of 2024 seeking withdrawal of the O.A. which is allowed and O.A. No.883 of 2024 stands disposed of as withdrawn. This Tribunal orders refund of court fee as per Rules. File be consigned to the Record Room after due compliance. Sd/- P.O. DRT-II |
Closed |
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Applicant Bank
- respondent
Defendants
Coram
P.O.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Ms D Corp Agro Foods Private Limited and Others versus Bank of Baroda
Gyanti Lavkush Chauhan versus Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company Ltd.
Mr Maharshi Trilok Joshi versus Piramal Capital and Housing Finance Limited Formerly Known as Dewan Housing Finance Corporation Limited
Sirajuddin Hafizullah Khan versus Tata Capital Housing Finance Limited