Dismissed
Maniram v. Punjab National Bank
DRTSA/924/2023
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The Debts Recovery Tribunal, Lucknow, allowed the withdrawal of Special Appeal No. 92/2025 filed by the applicant against the respondent bank and dismissed it as withdrawn.
What did the court decide?
Withdrawal of S.A. No. 92/2025 allowed; Special Appeal dismissed as withdrawn.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL
¶2
LUCKNOW
¶3
| Date oforder or proceedin} |
Order withsignatureofcourt | Officeaction takenwithdate |
|---|---|---|
| SANo.92m 14.10.2025 Sl No.9 |
Sh. Rana Rahul Singh Ld counsel forthe applicantispresent. Sh. Sandeep Bajpai Ldcounselforthe respondent bank is present. Ldcounselfor theapplicantispressing I.A. No. 3649/2025 early hearing application and I.A. Dy. No. 4971/2025 withdrawal application. Ldcounselfor the Applicants doesnot wanttopressthe SAandseekspermissionto withdrawtheS.A. Sinceapplicantis notinterestedtopress theSA1thereforerequest of Ld counselforthe Applicantsfor withdrawalof S.A. isallowed. Accordingly, the S.A. is dismissedas withdrawn. Record be consigned to recordroom. Pending I.A.ifany,alsodisposedoff. Order be uploaded on theTribunal’s website. (Dictated) (PravasKu PresidingOfficer (Manoj) |
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Rana Rahul Singh
- respondent
Bank
Coram
AI extract
Pravas Kumar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court