Disposed
M S Art Palace v. Punjab and Sind Bank
DRTSA/397/2023
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Disposed
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL LUCKNOW
¶2
| a proceeding |
Officeaction taken with date |
|
|---|---|---|
| S.A. No.397/2023 13.10.2025 SL.No.69 |
Shri Praveen Dwivedi Ld. Counselfor theapplicantispresent. Shri Anurag Srivastava Ld. Counselfor the respondent bankis present. Ld. Counsel for the respondent bank submits that accountrelatedto SA has been settledand closed. Ld. Counsel for the applicant hasgot noobjection. C+r/bc- In view of the fact,statementofShri Anurag Srivastava SA is~'disposed offbeing infructuous. Let the file be consigned torecord room. Order be uploaded on the Tribunal’s website. (Dictated) k (PravasKumarSngh) PresidingOfficer (Mugish) |
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Shri Praveen Dwivedi
- respondent
Respondent Bank
Coram
AI extract
Pravas Kumar Singh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court