Maliram Nanumal v. Central Bank of India
DRTSA/911/2024
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
1
¶2
$I.q. iqq -grr /zozq
¶3
xlTqT{fr 3rPrillTq-qdg{ (q. c. Ts uffis.rEqrq)
¶4
(ffi{ orffi -qrq-ffq aft rm ft.qlq.q}d)
¶5
gfl.q.;fEr{ -gtt/zozq
¶6
- 1 ffiqrfi-irq qrgord qrf.ri r=rrfi-q qrPJdrd .T.f (If, ftqio ro.oe.zoze) oTrerq Tq.ffsrIrdTH orqq-f, ss EFfi-E -s{,
¶7
- 2 orTvis.Ff orfrt"t r+rft-o nrgoro .r,f Bs 60-q 48 s$ (frfu-fi u-cn_cffir),
¶8
- J
¶9
- srfr-d,Trf Gndt"t rq{ftq {rgdrd .r,f ss o-ftq $ s{, (frfu-6 v<-nfuorer), q',fr ffi zhtwr i-s sM|
¶10
- frrrft sTrn-fr Grutr-flqH fr $-ScT strrqleI HrfuTgs+/2,rtqfr E-d-{ri Rkrr TFNITII'(qNT, i-r t-s, vro5v (u'.rr.) +szoos (frts'{ votrffir),
¶11
5 affiqq-m otqtrFrqh * Uqhd errtlld FrqRfr dqsZfrm. Eeft-d Grrtrld,qd =iqi rs fr+n d-{ trfr qrd-c ffidr, rMaT (\q) gq$rd s-Ssr zosoor (frfi-o vmvPror€r),
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court