Dismissed
Sri Nagendra Jha v. Central Bank of India
DRTSA/84/2022
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Dismissed
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
| Date of order or proceeding |
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, PATNA Order with the Signature of the Court |
Office action taken with date |
|---|---|---|
| SA 84 of 2022 | ||
| 28.04.2025 | Ld. counsel for the respondent submits that the respondent bank has withdrawn the possession notice in question under intimation to the applicant also by sending a letter. None is present for the applicant. In the aforesaid circumstances, the present SA has become Infructuous. Accordingly, it is dismissed as Infructuous. Order be uploaded on the Tribunal's website. |
|
| (Kaushalendra Yadav) Presiding Officer Patna |
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Applicant
- respondent
Respondent bank
Coram
AI extract
Kaushalendra Yadav
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court