Ashish Sharma v. Uco Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
In a sale application SA/477/2024, the DRT-I Chandigarh disposed of the matter because the applicant abandoned the petition after the bank reported no bid at the scheduled auction.
What did the court decide?
Sold all said SA stands disposed of.
What the court decided
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
SA/477/2024 ASHISH SHARMA Vs UCO BANK
28.04.2025 Item No.40
Present: Mr. Jatinder Kumar, Counsel for the Applicant. Mr. RK Jindal, Counsel for respondent bank.
Mr. Jindal, states that no bid was received by the bank in respect of the auction fixed up for 27.03.2025. In view of this, counsel for the applicant states that he does not want to pursue the present SA and the same stands disposed of .
File be consigned to record room after due compliance.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
PANKAJ
Parties & counsel
- applicant
ASHISH SHARMA
- respondent
UCO BANK
Coram
S Narang
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court