The Tribunal dismissed Section 14 Appraisal Proceedings for non-prosecution as the applicant failed to appear, file a show-cause, or comply with prior orders. Pending I.A.s were also dismissed.
Section 14 Appraisal Proceedings and pending I.A.s were dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Debts Recovery Tribuna!-III,Kolkata Order Sheet (Continuation)
Sri Hafijur Rahaman & Anr'
Vs
Case NO.SIy'TAO 12fJ24
UCO Bank
| Date of Order |
Orderwithsignature | officeaction withdat€and dated signatureof parties when |
|---|---|---|
| OrderNo.10 )t.28.11.2025 Sl.No.33 |
Present: I ForApplicant:None I ForRespondent :Ld. CounselS.Dev& V.Saha I I Todayisfixed for filingshowcause. I Heard Ld. LawyerforDefendantBank. I considered. I Noneappearsfor theSAAPplican, I PerusedOrderNo.07 dated 19/06/2025andOrderNo.08datedl 2sl08l2o2s. I No show causehasbeenfiled by theSA Applicantinter-.ofl earlier orderspassedbythisTribunal. I Itappearsthat theSAApplicantisnotwillingtoproceedwithl sA/7ao/2o24. I Hence, I Ordered SA |
7AOI2O24isdismissedfornon-prosecutionandfornon- compliancewiththeorderofthisTribunal. AllpendingI.A.sare also dismissedaccordingly. '- (KamarD-er PresidingOfflcer DRT-3,Kolkata |
1 issue framed by the court
Whether Section 14 Appraisal Proceeding should be dismissed for non-prosecution after the applicant failed to file a show-cause.
Sri Hafijur Rahaman & Anr
UCO Bank
Kamar Deo
Presiding Officer
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
