The Debts Recovery Tribunal dismissed an ex-parte proceeding as SA/458/2022 for non-prosecution and non-compliance with a previous order, staying any stay vacated and dismissing pending interim applications accordingly.
SA/458/2022 dismissed for non-prosecution and non-compliance; stay vacated; all pending I.A.s dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Debts Recovery Tribunal-III, Kolkata
Order Sheet (Continuation)
New Shyama Textiles & Anr.
Vs
Case No.sAl4sal2o22
Bajaj Housing Finance Ltd.
| Orderwithsignature | Office action withdateand dated sisnatureof |
|
|---|---|---|
| OrderNo.11 Sl.No.37 |
Present: ForApplicant:None ForRespondent :Ld. CounselA.Bhattacharya(Virtualtlode) |
|
| Todayisfixed for filingshowcause. Heard Ld. LawyerforDefendantF.L Considered, |
||
| Noneappearsfor theSAApplicant. | ||
| No show cause has beenfiled bytheSAApplicantintermso earlierOrder No.10datedfil}9/2125. It_9p!-"il:that theSAAppticantis notwiltingtoproceed with sA/458/2022. |
||
| Hence, | ||
| Ordered | ||
| SA/45812022isdismissedfornon-prosecuttonandlornon_ compliancewiththe order of thisTflbunal. Stay, if any, standsvacated. All pendingI.A.s arealso dismissed accordingly. |
||
| (KamalDe) PresidingOfficer DRT-3,Kotkata |
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to proceed with zaak 458/2022 in the absence of the applicant.
Whether to allow for compliance with the earlier order of this Tribunal.
New Shyama Textiles & Anr.
Bajaj Housing Finance Ltd.
Kamal De
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
