Dilip Tak v. Canara Bank
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 45
Case No. SA/766/2023
DILIP TAK Vs CANARA BANK
Date: 08.04.2025.
Proceedings through hybrid mode
Present:
Shri Rohit Tantia, Counsel for the Applicant
Shri Mohit Khandelwal, Counsel for the Respondent Bank/FI
Counsel for the applicant submits that they have conveyed the orders to the applicant passed by this Tribunal on the last date of hearing, but now the applicant not contact to him.
In view of the above, this Securitization Application stands dismissed and the bank is at liberty to proceed as per law.
File be consigned to record, as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
DILIP TAK
- respondent
CANARA BANK
Coram
Vimal Gupta
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court