Rajasthan Marudhara Gramin Bank v. Jagdish
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 112
Case No. OA/1094/2024
RAJASTHAN MARUDHARA GRAMIN BANK Vs JAGDISH Date: 07.04.2025. Proceedings through hybrid mode Present:
Shri Vikram Dagur, Counsel for the Applicant None for the Defendants
In this matter, Ld. Counsel for the applicant bank submits that account sands settled, therefore, he prayed for withdrawal of Original Application and refund of court fee.
In view of the above submission, this Original Application stands disposed off. Registry is directed to refund the court fees as per rules.
All the pending interim applications also stands disposed of.
File be consigned to record, as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Parties & counsel
- applicant
RAJASTHAN MARUDHARA GRAMIN BANK
- respondent
JAGDISH
Coram
Vimal Gupta
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court