This is a dismissal order in a Securitization Application filed before the Debts Recovery Tribunal. The application was dismissed because the applicant's counsel did not appear on the assigned date and stated there were no instructions.
Securitization Application dismissed on account of non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 56
Case No. SA/756/2023
SHAKTI SINGH TANWAR Vs CHOLAMANDALAM INVESTMENT AND FINANCE LIMITED
Date: 17.04.2025.
Proceedings through hybrid mode Present:
Shri Kapil Kumar Kumawat, Counsel for the Applicant
Ms. Kratika Sharma, Counsel for the Respondent Bank/FI
Counsel for the applicant has pleaded no instructions on behalf of the applicant, therefore, this Securitization Application stands dismissed on account of non-prosecution.
File be consigned to record, as per rules. Copy of order be uploaded on website.
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Shakti Singh Tanwar
Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Limited
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
