Ms Century Cotton Mills v. Bank of Baroda
Case brief
What is this about?
This order disposes of the special appeal as 'not pressed' because the applicant's counsel submitted no instructions on record. No substantive legal issue was decided.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court of the Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Jaipur
Item No. 31
Case No. SA/307/2022
MS CENTURY COTTON MILLS Vs BANK OF BARODA
Date: 17.04.2025.
Proceedings through hybrid mode
Present:
Shri Tanuj Gupta, Counsel for the Applicant
Ms. Praneeta Agarwal, Counsel for the Respondent Bank/FI
In this matter, Counsel for the applicant submits that he pleads no instructions from the applicant.
Considering the submission made by Counsel for the applicant, this SA stands disposed of as not pressed.
Copy of the order be given free to the concerned parties.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
MS Century Cotton Mills
- respondent
Bank of Baroda
Coram
Vimal Gupta
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court