In a securitisation application filed by the applicant against Union Bank of India, the applicant failed to appear for the hearing. The Tribunal dismissed the application in default for non-prosecution and vacated any pending interim stay.
Securitisation Application No. 73/2025 dismissed in default for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, AURANGABAD (BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT AT AURANGABAD) ORDER SHEET
28.08.2025
Sr. No.27 SA No. 73/2025
SECURITISATION APPLICTION NO. 73/2025.
Ratnamal Bausaheb Gore. ..Applicant
Versus
Union Bank of India and Anr. ..Respondents
None for the applicant
Mr. Atul A. Mishra –Advocate for respondents present.
1. In this matter, nobody is appearing to conduct the
proceeding for applicant. Earlier also nobody has appeared.
2. Today, also none appeared for the applicant. It appears that
the applicant is not interested in prosecuting the matter.
3. In view of the above, I pass the following order.
ORDER
A. The Securitisation Application No. 73/2025 stands
dismissed in default for non-prosecution.
B. Pending IA’s in the proceeding, if any, are disposed of
accordingly. The interim Stay, if any also stands vacated.
C. File be consigned to the record room.
(Dr. J.R. Chauhan)
Presiding Officer
Debts Recovery Tribunal, Aurangabad
Classifi cation No. of Exh.
[Ambadas] (SA No. 73/2025) Page 1 of 1
Ratnamal Bausheb Gore
Union Bank of India
Dr. J.R. Chauhan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
