Order allowing an interim application for withdrawal of a_special application after amicable settlement between applicant and respondent.
I.A.No. 2281 of 2024 allowed and disposed of as withdrawn upon settlement.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Debts Recovery Tribunal-3, Kolkata Order Sheet (Continuation)
| caseNo.sa/6 | i6l2022 SaniaYxumarShaw Vs. Authorised Officer ofAssetsReconstructionCo.IndiaLtd& |
|---|---|
| Ors | |
| . Orderwithsignature |
|
| OrderNo.07 Dt.07.01.2025 Sl.No.21 |
Present! ForApplicant:Ld. CounselN. C.Dason behalfofS. Biswas ForDefendant:None |
| lAl228l/24istakenupforhearing. HeardLd.counselforSAApplicant. considered. LdCounselfortheSA ApplicantfiledI.ANo'2281of2024 prayingforwithdrawalofthemain S,A. Theapplicat'onis supportedbyAffidavitof theSA applicantMr'SanjayKumar Shaw.DuringthePendencyoftheS A thematter hasbeen settledwith theRespondentandtheRespondentis not going to continuewaththeinstantproceeding. Sincethisisanamicable settlementbetweenthepartiesandtheSAApplicant intends to withdrawthemainS.A., no prejudicewillbecausedif theLA 's allowedwithoutinvitingresponsefrom othersideAccord'ngly' theinstantI.A.isallowedandstandsdisposedofbeing dismissedaswithdrawnassettled amicably' |
|
| s.A.No. 636of2022 alongwith all otherpendingI A s, ifany' asdisposed ofaswithdrawn. trle be consrqnedtoRecord Roomafterobserving all formalrtres' |
|
| (KamalDe) PresidingOfficer DRT-3, Kolkata |
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sanjay Kumar Shaw
Authorised Officer of Assets Reconstruction Company India Ltd & Ors
KamalDe
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
